Chelsea administrator Jose Mourinho says a "fight" against his side is at fault for four of his players grabbing bookings for plunging this season.
Cesc Fabregas turned into the most recent Blues player to see yellow for recreation in Sunday's 1-1 draw at Southampton, however it showed up he had been tripped by Saints left-back Matt Targett.
Gary Cahill, specifically, pulled in feedback prior in December for what was judged to have been a swoop against Hull City, however Mourinho says every choice has been a "terrible yellow card".
"I think its plainly the aftereffect of something that resembles a fight," he told columnists. "In the first match Diego [costa] got a yellow card when if it have been a punishment and red card at Burnley.
"A couple of months after the fact we lose two focuses in a match where the punishment is there and Fabregas gets a yellow card [on Sunday at Southampton]. In football we are continually attempting - or we ought to dependably attempt - to change the terrible things and the twofold discipline is something inconceivable.
"You have a punishment and likely you win. You don't get the punishment and you get a yellow card. It ought to be simple - [referee] Anthony [taylor] goes to a screen, he sees he commits an error, he's a great fellow, a legit gentleman, he keeps in touch with 'I committed an error' and lets [rescind] the yellow card to Fabregas. It ought to be straightforward.
"[they are] Bad yellow cards. You can say that. I'm not saying all, however the urgent ones, on the grounds that we're talking about vital choices. Case in point, the diversion against Hull City - do you think the most critical thing of the amusement was Cahill or would it say it was Filipe Luis very nearly with a broken leg? For me that is the urgent purpose of the amusement."
At the point when asked who he thought was behind the crusade against Chelsea, Mourinho answered: "I don't have a clue, however for instance after the diversion against West Ham - great amusement, typical amusement, 2-0, ought to be four, ought to be five, Valencia made a terrible swoop and toward the end of the amusement Sam [allardyce] is talking about Ivanovic! What is this? What is this? For what? Why? Which plan? Furthermore today you come here, its pivotal choice, one of these matches between two great groups, troublesome match, relatively few open doors for both sides, essential choices, and the ref settles on a wrong choice. Do I need at fault the arbitrator? I simply say he committed an error. Simply that."
On the Fabregas episode, Mourinho included: "My perspective is the same as yours. It's the perspective of everyone. There are circumstances in matches where we can have distinctive presumptions, and you think something, I think something else yet there are others where everybody has the same conclusion.
"I'm stating we don't have to talk about it in light of the fact that everybody knows.
"Why [was Fabregas booked]because the arbitrator committed an error. Individuals commit errors, he committed an error. Huge mix-up, yet an error. He's a decent arbitrator. He's a decent fellow from what I know. He's young and has forever and a day of football in front of him. It is a huge misstep however tomorrow is an alternate day and on January 1 he has an alternate match against QPR and life goes on."
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق